Instead of — Sharing a key instead of sharing control
Shared control without a shared key
Each person acts with their own key inside their own role. Nobody inherits anyone else’s — and every action is attributable.
Solutions · Team collaboration
Each person gets the access their job needs — nobody inherits a master key.
Who may act on Transfer Assets
The argument
Instead of — Sharing a key instead of sharing control
Each person acts with their own key inside their own role. Nobody inherits anyone else’s — and every action is attributable.
Instead of — Co-signing that makes every action heavy
Grant exactly the operations a teammate needs, so day-to-day work moves while sensitive work still waits for a second person.
Instead of — Work that lives in one person’s browser
Requests, approvals, and cancellations are recorded as operations — what is waiting, and who it waits on, is visible.
Instead of — People changing faster than wallets do
Permissions change while the account keeps running. Someone leaving is a role change, not a migration.
This covers
Whoever you name, and only for the operations you name them for. Roles decide who may request, who must wait, who may approve, and who may execute — and the contract refuses an unauthorised call before it reaches your funds, rather than relying on an interface to prevent it.
Roles and approvalsNo. Particle CS never holds your keys. Operations are authorised by your own accounts against policy that lives on-chain, so there is no custodian to trust and none to fail.
How we can be checkedFive steps, the same under every solution: Request, Wait, Approve, Execute, Evidence. A pending operation can still be cancelled inside the waiting window.
See lifecycleSepolia today. Ethereum mainnet coming soon. The Platform is alpha · testnet · personal workspace, so treat today's scope as the honest limit rather than a roadmap.
Related
Platform in the browser, or Protocol in your own systems.
Alpha · Testnet · Personal workspace